Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/September/12
September 12
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was speedy delete
Misspelling of correct Cat:German company stubs. Empty. Can probably be speedied. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete
Seriously undersized, and cross-cat to boot, overlapping as it does Quebec and Ontario. Alai 18:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There was a discussion on this point at Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/discussion#Ottawa, National Capital Region, and stubs. A consensus did seem to develop to restub the articles in {{Ottawa-area-stub}} with {{Ottawa-stub}}, but then to reword {{Ottawa-stub}} with the {{Ottawa-area-stub}} wording. That way the stub would work well for all National Capital Region articles, even those pertaining to subjects located outside the Ottawa city boundaries. Skeezix1000 18:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Works for me but with added comments:
- There was never any proposal at WP:WSS of an Ottawa area stub or a National capital region stub category, so why they exist is a bit of a mystery to start with.
- Since there is no Cat:National Capital Region parent, and that name is very ambiguous, this should be deleted.
- {{Ottawa-area-stub}} seems to be a geo-stub and there could well be a case for the creation of an {{Ottawa-geo-stub}}, leading into a Cat:Greater Ottawa geography stubs category, as a subcategory of Cat:Ottawa stubs.
- Therefore I suggest splitting Ottawa stubs into Ottawa-stub/cat:Ottawa stubs and Ottawa-geo-stub/cat:Greater Ottawa geography stubs, the latter to be a subcategory of the former, and getting rid of the badly named "area" stub and its associated category. This would split the current Ottawa stubs almost exactly into two equally sized groups and - more importantly - would parallel the system used for other cities which have their own stub types (London, Sydney, Washington DC, etc). Grutness...wha? 23:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. That would be consistent with Toronto, the only other Canadian example, which has both a stub and a geo-stub. Alai and I have reworded {{Ottawa-stub}}, as discussed above. As for the geo stub cat, I would avoid calling it "Greater Ottawa" -- for whatever reason, no one uses that term (perhaps because it was attached to some failed municipal reorganization proposals in the 1980s and 1990s). I think Ottawa geography stubs or Ottawa area georgraphy stubs would be fine. The wording of the template can mirror {{Ottawa-stub}}. Skeezix1000 11:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.