Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wilhelm Reich

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Discussion has stalled, no resolution appears imminent.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Wilhelm Reich

view edit delete watch
Filed: 08:56, June 28 2024 (UTC)

Involved parties

Nescio* (talk · contribs)
SlimVirgin (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

Wilhelm Reich

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

The issue is the lead section. According to NPOV, it should reflect the majority and significant-minority published view of what Wilhelm Reich is remembered for. Some people believe he was a crank, [1] while others apparently believe he was an important psychotherapist, whose work is still highly regarded. The question is where the emphasis should lie.
Nescio* (talk · contribs) is an almost single-issue editor who has been reverting to his version of the lead since December 2005, either as Nescio* or as an anon; for example, as 83.171.146.173 (talk · contribs). Nescio* believes that my version of the lead is unfair to Reich.
This is my version. This is Nescio*'s version. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 19:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note from Nescio*: I mainly edit in the German Wiki: [2] --Nescio* ]

A second note: I'll be offline from 22nd Sept for about three weeks. --Nescio* 20:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional issues to be mediated

My only concern is the lead section. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 09:00, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 09:00, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Nescio* 14:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Extend: Awaiting Nescio*'s return.

For the Mediation Committee, —Guan aco 03:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Being back now. --Nescio* 11:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this case still pending? Shouldn't it be accepted, since Nescio came back? If it is accepted, I will take on this case--¿¡Exir Kamalabadi?!^{Join Esperanza!} 13:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that offer, Exir, but these cases are handled by members of the Mediation Committee. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 13:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted. For the Mediation Committee, Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 04:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this case. --דניאל - Danie lroc ks123 ^contribs 23:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance by SlimVirgin
Accepted. --Nescio* 21:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Proceeding with mediation here

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.