Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Shining Path

Shining Path edit

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Mediation has stalled; case is stale.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 03:23, September 14 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Articles involved edit

Shining Path

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted: edit

This has literally been debated on Talk:Shining Path since at least June 2003. No real consensus has ever been reached, and the issue has come under fairly intense debate on that page for the past month and a half. I don't think anything short of mediation will allow for a genuine consensus to be built.

Issues to be mediated edit

Whether the article should begin with the official name of the group in bold, which is the Communist Party of Peru, or whether it should begin with the name that most English speakers use when referring to it, which is Shining Path. Please note that this is not a dispute on where the article should be; everyone seems to pretty much agree that it should be at Shining Path.
Whether the article should link to sv:Perus kommunistiska parti or if it should link to sv:Den lysande stigen

Additional issues to be mediated edit

- (referring to Descendall's first item) Descendall is already tilting the question to the answer he is looking for. This "issue" should read:
  - Whether the article should begin with the name this group wants to call itself in bold, which is the Communist Party of Peru, considering that there are several other Peruvian political groups that refer to themselves with the same name(see Communism in Peru), or whether it should begin with the name that most English speakers use when referring to it, which is Shining Path (English for "Sendero Luminoso"). Please note that this is not a dispute on where the article should be; everyone seems to pretty much agree that it should be at Shining Path.
- (referring to Descendall's first item) This question is ALSO tilted in a way that let's Descendall get the answer he is looking for. It should read:
  - Whether the article should link to sv:Den lysande stigen, the correct Swedish wikipedia page for the group, or if it should link to sv:Perus kommunistiska parti, a redirect page.''
- Furthermore, SOMAN is also imposing his will in the Swedish Page, and reverting from Shining Path to Communist Party of Peru.--AAAAA 02:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree --Descendall 03:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. --Cúchullain ^t/c 12:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree.----AAAAA 04:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree.----Jmabel 19:38, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree.--Soman 09:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

Accept:

For the Mediation Committee, —Guan aco 04:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming this isn't a stale issue, I'd be willing to mediate this case. Please indicate whether you agree to me mediating below, as well as whether you would prefer public or private (email) mediation. If it's a stale issue, just say so. Thanks! Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 14:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barring any disagreement from the other parties, I'm certainly fine with you mediating the dispute. As I told you on your talk page, this issue is far from moot. --Descendall 19:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accept, and as I said above I don't care about public or private. - Jmabel | Talk 01:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accept, don't care if it's public or private.--Cúchullain ^t/c 22:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accept, Public OK for me.--AAAAA 02:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for response from Soman.... Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 03:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accept, I prefer public mediation. --Soman 09:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to all of you. Beginning mediation here. Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 23:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as stale. Essjay (Talk) 10:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.