Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Nathan David Lamardo Curtis

Nathan David Lamardo Curtis

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Nathancurtis1 (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Example2 (talk · contribs)
3. Example3 (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Balloon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. Balloon animal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Balloon#I disagree with this edit

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Should the two articles be merged?
2. Should the picture in the lead of Balloon be a helium balloon or a hot air balloon?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2
• Comment - For the information of the coordinator, see declined filing at WP:DRN. The editor apparently wants an explanation of why his autobiography is being declined. There doesn't appear to be a content dispute. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Nathancurtis1 (talk) 02:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Not a mediation request since no other parties listed. Moreover, the remedy to a rejected draft is to simply create the article in mainspace and see if it survives, but you should be aware that if an article does not survive the draft process it is likely to be very quickly deleted if you attempt that. Working at the Wikipedia Teahouse to resolve your questions is strongly recommended. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 02:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC) (Chairperson)