Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ascended master

Ascended master edit

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Inactivity

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 18:24, October 30 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Articles involved edit

Ascended master

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted: edit

WP:RFC ~~I didn't notice this one on the list, however, the editor in question seems to be little interested in discussion.~~ Page did go through RFC: [1]. My bad. Thanks Hele!
WP:AN/I ~~Is ANI the right place for content disputes?~~ 3RR incident leading to 12 hour block

Issues to be mediated edit

Should the NPOV tag be present on the article?
Are the opposing links appropriate for inclusion?

Additional issues to be mediated edit

( N / A )

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree - Richfife 18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - Aburesz 22:16, 8 November 2006
Agree. Quendus 19:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree --Vindheim 20:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Hele 7 12:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

Accept

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[yell at me]} 01:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will mediate this, assuming User:Aburesz is willing to join. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that everyone has agreed to the mediation, please indicate whether you would prefer public or private mediation. Thanks! --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not very familiar with the procedure, so I browsed around and found that "The mediation process is private and the mediator and disputants are expected to keep the process confidential." [2]. See also [3]. Please correct me if this is not true. Hele 7 09:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like it to be private it is private. However some prefer it to be public therefore I gave that option. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have agreed to Mediation, and welcome this opportunity to restore a neutral, academic and informative atmosphere to the article page on the topic of "Ascended Masters" - which is NOT unique to any one person or religious organization. Aburesz 16:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This case is now being mediated by email. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this mediation still ongoing? edit

The notice has been re-inserted on Talk:Ascended_master that this mediation is still ongoing! Is it? If so, what is going on? Aburesz 17:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.