Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Another editor and I disagree as to what should be included in an article; Stranger Things (TV series)

Another editor and I disagree as to what should be included in an article; Stranger Things (TV series)

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Peter K Burian (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Favre1fan93 (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Stranger Things (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Favre1fan93#I disagree with this edit

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Should the Introduced in Season 2 not include ALL characters who are introduced? I added them; he deleted them. Discussed in Talk but still disagree. "how can the section Introduced in Season 2 not include Max and Billy? There are six new characters. Not four. The title of that section is not Minor Characters Introduced in Season 2."

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Peter K Burian (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
2. Refuse. The talk page discussion process has not been exhausted, despite what Peter K Burian may feel (as they started this mediation discussion). A resolution can be formed in that space, and this is not needed at this time. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC) (Chairperson)