Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2014 August 17

Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

August 17

A properties of acids and caustic alkalis

Does a microlife (germs, bacteria, viruses) been in the acids and caustic alkalis?--Alex Sazonov (talk) 11:56, 17 August 2014 (UTC) As I been knowing, the acid and excess acidic environment is been eating by them's.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 13:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Snottite. Wnt (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Acidophiles and alkaliphiles exist. Red Act (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I been suppose that, anyone chemical environment is been a biological!--Alex Sazonov (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Pretty much. See Extremophile#Classifications. Red Act (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

The most simplest form of biological is been chemical-physical materia or not it been biological?--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

For a discussion of the simplest possible forms of life, see Abiogenesis. Red Act (talk) 19:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I thinking that, a chemical oxides (химические окиси) and oxideis of chemical (химические окислы) are beening the absolute chemical environment.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

But so, the absolute chemical environment always had been a biologically properties and biologically specifications.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 19:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

These two sentences are hard to understand, mainly because the phrase "absolute chemical environment" doesn't make sense. But I presume the word "absolute" is a translation of "aбсолютный", which can also mean "perfect", and "perfect chemical environment" does make sense. I.e., I think the intended meaning of these two sentences is something like: "I think that oxides are the ideal chemical environment. However, the ideal chemical environment is a property specific to the organism." Red Act (talk) 19:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I mean that, the absolute (ideal) chemical environment is been the zero biological, but of course it always had been a biologically properties and biologically specifications.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 10:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC) I think that, an oxides group is been the chemical environment of terminates biological, but not all chemical elements of oxides group made it.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I been suggest that, an oxides group consisted from this: окиси, окислы, закиси, закислы, углеродные перекиси, углеродные перекислы, but I don’t know how it’s translate in English, because I had not got a special English translate.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 15:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC) The list partly translates as "Nitrous oxide, oxides, nitrous oxide, закислы, carbon peroxide, carbon перекислы". 84.209.89.214 (talk) 11:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I suppose that, a sulfates and sulfides are not been included in oxides group, because they had been an alkaline ash in most cases, that’s why they always been an alkalis.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

can we ban him already? as did ruwiki 66.249.81.61 (talk) 21:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I've proposed this on the talk page. Tevildo (talk) 23:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I’m sorry for my English! Did the chemical hydrolyzing of complex (implex) chemical substances been? I been think that, in Nature been only the chemical hydrolyzing of simple chemical substances.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Medical test result human error statistics

How common are test result errors in developed countries as a result of human error? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.251.149.21 (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm thinking This book may be just what you are looking for. --Jayron32 01:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)