Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2019 October 30
| Miscellaneous desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < October 29 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 31 > |
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
October 30
editShould the TeamTrees project have its own article? It's getting quite big on YouTube. 113.23.6.77 (talk) 16:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- If there's enough reliable sources, an article can be made - be WP:BOLD and do it yourself if you think that makes sense. However, the existing article doesn't seem to have an overwhelming amount of space devoted to it, nor an over-abundance of references devoted to it. In cases like that, it's often better to update the existing article until it becomes obvious that a split is required. Matt Deres (talk) 16:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- See WP:42. The decision to make an article depends on whether or not you can find enough reliable source text that you can cite when writing the article. If there are enough good sources that you can write a reasonable-length article on any subject using those sources, then get on it. No one is stopping you. --Jayron32 16:46, 30 October 2019 (UTC)