Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2019 February 11

Mathematics desk
< February 10 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 12 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


February 11

edit

Turning an iterative equation into a differential equation

edit

I have something of the form

 ,

and would like to convert this into a differential equation, e.g.

 .

How would I do this?--Leon (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could derive an approximately equivalent differential equation as follows:
 
In effect, the difference equation is then a numerical solution to the differential equation with a step size of 1. Note, however, that solutions to the difference equation and the differential equation may have quite different behaviours. Gandalf61 (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They do! Is there a procedure for finding differential equations that satisfy such relations?--Leon (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may be interested in Delay differential equation#Solving DDEs (which seems to indicate that this isn't possible). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 12:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Star trooper man: Suppose  ; then your first equation becomes   and it is satisfied by any periodic function with period 1. IMHO no function   will give the second equation   a potential of generating all possible periodic functions   (with restriction of 1 being a period). Consider   being a sine or a Dirichlet's function
 
--CiaPan (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is the fractional iteration problem, solutions are not unique, but you can try to find solutions with nice analytical properties. The simplest way to get to solutions is to find fixed points of  . If   is a fixed point of   and   is larger than zero, then taking  very close to   and applying the function     times leads to  , and you can then extend this exponential relationship to real  . This then defines   for real   even if   is not close to a fixed point, as long as you can get arbitrarily close to a fixed point by iterating using either   or its inverse. Count Iblis (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See also Abel equation. Count Iblis (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]