Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2014 August 12
| Language desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 11 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | Current desk > |
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
August 12
edit"Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word"
editWandering around Librarything I came across a book called "Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word" by Walter J. Ong. Apparently it is a real book, but is the title serious or an intentional piss-take? It sounds like something produced by the Postmodernist Generator. DuncanHill (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Seems like a perfectly understandable, reasonable title to me. Things like writing, printing (and, today, online communication) are "technologies" in dealing with the word, and the idea seems to be that through the introduction of such technologies, the way people thought and dealt with language in general changed. What's wrong with that? Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well it assumes that there is a verb "to technologize". Is there? --85.119.25.27 (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Google Books finds four instances of the word "technologizing" from the 1950s. I can't find anything from earlier than that, and I didn't bother looking for other forms of the verb. So it's been attestable now for about 60 years. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note that Ong studied under Marshall McLuhan at St. Louis U. That's an obviously McLuhanesque subtitle. The book iself is not without interest, though. Deor (talk) 12:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Google Books finds four instances of the word "technologizing" from the 1950s. I can't find anything from earlier than that, and I didn't bother looking for other forms of the verb. So it's been attestable now for about 60 years. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well it assumes that there is a verb "to technologize". Is there? --85.119.25.27 (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Could anyone suggest a translation of the title in the sort of words that are used by normal, highly literate people (as opposed to linguists)? DuncanHill (talk) 14:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- How about "Spoken and written language - the impact of technology on communication"? --Nicknack009 (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'd read that! DuncanHill (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- How about "Spoken and written language - the impact of technology on communication"? --Nicknack009 (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)