Wikipedia:Peer review/Wickety Wak/archive1

Wickety Wak

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because myself and other editors have attempted to clean it up only for our edits to be constantly reverted.

Article does not follow proper objective or encyclopedic tone. Any attempts by editors to maintain tone have been reverted by an author having close connection to subject material, including removal of User:Talk entries. Suspect COI. Author has expressed defensive behaviour over edits. Should we ask for third party intervention instead?

Thanks, LoofNeZorf (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review from I'm Aya Syameimaru!: All members of Wickety Wak who have Wikipedia IPs and accounts must be banned, period. All those accounts are operated by the band, meaning that they're sockpuppets (I think). Discuss this issue at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. This is urgent! Also the article must be rewritten and reworded entirely to comply with this website's rules and guidelines, there. Plus, the article must be confirmed protected with no time limit. _{Aya Syameimaru 文々。新聞} 09:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

However, apparently the nominator's inactive (at least temporarily), so I'm closing this. _{Aya Syameimaru 文々。新聞} 10:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]