Wikipedia:Peer review/Wendy's/archive1

Wendy's edit

This page should eventually be a featured article. Until then, it needs improvement. I've got some ideas, but i'd like to see more 11kowrom 22:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I fixed the wikilink 69.40.243.98 22:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by AndyZ:

Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.

Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.

The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.

Please provide WP:CITE information for references/footnotes. See also WP:CITE/ES; templates like {{Cite web}} and {{Cite book}} may be useful here.
This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.
The article has a few or too many inline external links, which hamper the readibility of the article. Please convert them to footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA.
As notable as the "Chili hoax" was, it probably doesn't deserve its own section; suggest merging it into history as a ===level 3 heading.

Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
Thanks, AndyZ _t 23:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think the "chili hoax" is rather notable. The legal case kept the story in the news for quite a while and I expect it had some impact on their business. Some other things you might consider adding: (1) Charitable giving. Wendy's sponsors a number of events, especially in central Ohio. I would find a non-Wendy's source for these[1]. (2) Political contributions. I've read that Wendy's corporate contributions are at a rate nearly three times that of McDonalds. 94% goes to support the republican party. I would want to find another source for this[2]. Good luck. -MrFizyx 03:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that charitable giving/sponsorships/political contributions are important. -- Zanimum 13:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]