Wei Yan edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because the page has major improvements as per the previous peer reviews requirements which noticed the article's problems, including:
- reducing some WP:Oversection problem which not solved for more than a decade
- improving the pupular culture legacy section with each of quotation reference by @KeeperOfThePeace:
- summarized the "analysis" section.
- reference now has page numbers or at least the link to the page in each books/journals
- inline citations improvements, including the quotation from secondary sources such as modern time academic figures & universities researches which gave commentary to the primary sources by @Z1720:
i humbly asking for senior member of wikipedia 3kingdom project too for this review @Benjitheijneb:, @Jftsang: @Underbar dk:
Asking fellow peer reviewer volunteers too @Vice regent: @Goldsztajn:
Thanks before, hopefully this page can be improved to GA. Ahendra (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Ahendra, I'm happy to leave some comments but see that you haven't edited in a while—are you still working on this? Please ping me if you get a chance to respond. Best – Aza24 (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Ahendra For some reason, I've only just received this ping. As with Aza24, let me know if you are still interested in a response (although I have to admit this is far from an area of strength for me!). Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2022 (UTC)