Wikipedia:Peer review/V838 Monocerotis/archive1
I just finished a complete rewrite of the article on this really enigmatic star. I'm not an astronomer and I have read the sources through more or less carelessly--therefore the article may include self-contradictions (others than arising from conflicting papers) and misunderstandings. Plus the obligatory grammatical errors, of course. Any corrections are greatly appreciated!--JyriL talk 23:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Great article! I corrected a minor grammatical problem in the lead. I do think this could use a good once-over by someone who's not been involved with writing the text to tighten up some of the phrasing. I may have time to look at it more closely tomorrow.
- The Hubble photo is amazing, of course. —ptk✰fgs 00:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Automated suggestions are provided here, that you may wish to refer for some useful style guidelines. - Mailer Diablo 17:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looking good, though the section about planet-swallowing could do with a description of the 1-planet model given in some of the references. There's also [1], which claims that the planet model has severe problems and can be ruled out. Chaos syndrome 17:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)