I've listed this article for peer review because I'm trying to weigh whether it's worth taking to GA. It's right on the bubble of what I would consider worth such a classification. It's comprehensive in the sense that I've incorporated everything available from sources (except some details of family, which I'm going to include shortly), but any advice on how to improve this article to meet GA criteria or even whether it's a worthwhile nomination at all would be helpful.
Thanks, ~ RobTalk 16:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
