I've listed this article for peer review because…
I want to know what I must improve upon to become a Good Article
Thanks, Mtjannetta (talk) 04:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like a good start to me, just a few things on first glance..
- Any time the title of the film is mentioned in the prose it should be italicized, The Third Alarm, not "The Third Alarm".
- A section on themes should be sourced and well-cited to avoid WP:OR. If you're intending to go for GA, I'd check the WP:GACR page.
- The presentation of the critical responses, with collapsible boxes and the images of the magazine covers seems to be more decorative than anything. I haven't seen any other film articles present their critical response sections like that. I'd check out recent GAs and FAs from WP:FILM to get an idea of what a really good critical response section looks like. Rfl0216 (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
