Svetozar Delić edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to make a GA out of it. I know it's quite short, but it's the best I can do given the scarcity of sources.
Thanks, —Admiral Norton (talk) 17:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Comments by Ricardiana
Done
Hi, this is quite an interesting article. You mentioned the scarcity of sources - I tried putting "Svetozar Delić" into a Google Books search, and a number of items came up (no previews available, unfortunately). Do you have access to library that could get some of these? I would offer to get them myself and add info to the article, but unfortunately most of them are not in English and I couldn't read them. Ricardiana (talk) 03:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Thinking of the GA criteria:
- Well-written - I've made a number of small changes to grammar - word order, use of articles, etc.
- Verifiable - yes.
- Broad in coverage - see above. This language's Wikipedia article [1] lists a couple of additional sources in particular.
- Neutral - yes.
- Stable - yes.
- Images - I think this is OK. I'm not an expert, though.
Ricardiana (talk) 15:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)