Wikipedia:Peer review/Sindhis/archive1

Sindhis edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because it has been a very long time since the article was peer reviewed or possibly might've never been under a peer-review before, Between November 2022 and April 2023 the article went under a general overhaul via which alot of necessary information was added, after all that I believe an external instance on this topic is now crucial and I request a peer-review

Thanks, ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️ 10:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 edit

Comments after a quick skim:

"Wink 2002, p. 203." What source is this? There's no full citation to an author named Wink.
"McIntosh 2008, p. 387:" Same as above
"Dyson 2018, p. 29" Same as above
"Wright 2009," Same as above.
Quotes are usually not necessary in the inline citations, as the reader can look up the source themselves to verify the information. Examples include refs 157, 158, 159
Per MOS:ALLCAPS, titles of works and publishers should not be in all caps in the references sections. Examples include refs 149, 151, 110.
Why is 137 a reliable source?
Most paragraphs in the article should have an inline citation at the end of the last sentence. Exceptions include the lede.
The Festivals section suffers from MOS:OVERSECTION and should be divided.
There are no citations in the Notable people section, which need to be included to verify that these people are part of the Sindhis group
Per WP:RS/P, Joshua Project is considered an unreliable source and should be removed from the article.
Notes need a citation at the end of each one.

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 19:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]