I've listed this article for peer review because I want to improve it but I'm just getting repeatedly bogged down in discussion with another user, as you can see at Talk:Self-managed_social_center#Developing_this_page and Talk:Self-managed_social_center#Developing_this_page_2. The current structure is not satisfying, since it's split between incomplete coverage of functions and a breakdown by country. I'd welcome some feedback on how to improve the page.
Much obliged for any comments, Mujinga (talk) 10:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Mujinga, hello and apologies for the long wait! I'll try to get to reviewing this in the next few days. My only comment for now is that the Italy, United States and United Kingdom sections should probably be subsectioned under a separate header (something like Examples). Hope this helps for now. Thanks, Thatone
weirdwikier Say hi 15:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, here we go. Hope this helps!
- "free schools" is in bold for some reason.
- "United States" should be linked at its first mention ("for example in Italy, the United States and the United Kingdom".)
- Uses: "infoshop" is linked despite the link appearing in the lede.
- History: "enclave" should be linked.
- "Wobbly union halls" - is this a proper noun?
- "squatted" should be delinked.
- The second paragraph doesn't seem to fully talk about autonomous social centers - it seems more of an opinionated viewpoint.
- Italy: The first sentence links to the main article of this section.
- United Kingdom: Same problem as above.
- "infoshop" should be delinked.
- Infoshops: There seems to be more detail into this description than in the article, but it should be the other way around.
- Same as above for Free schools, although that doesn't seem to have an article.
- "economics" should be delinked.
- Mujinga, that's everything. Let me know if there are any problems. Thanks, Thatone
weirdwikier Say hi 01:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for taking a look Mujinga (talk) 11:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
