Wikipedia:Peer review/Scheme programming language/archive1

Scheme programming language edit

I think this is an excellent article and would like to move towards making it a featured article. Ideogram 23:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the nomination, will be back in a couple of minutes with suggestions. AndyZ 23:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. For an article of this length, the lead should contain 2-3 paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
Done. Ideogram 23:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
Done. Ideogram 02:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:MOS, the first letters of words in heading should not be capitalized unless: 1) it is a proper noun or 2) it is the first word of the heading. (mainly: Hello World)
Done. Ideogram 02:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please provide WP:CITE information for references/footnotes. See also WP:CITE/ES; templates like {{Cite web}} and {{Cite book}} may be useful here.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.
I have tagged the statements requiring citations. I hope other people will help me fill them out. Ideogram 18:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • All quotations should have WP:FOOTNOTEs or other forms of inline citations.
Done. Ideogram 08:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Ideogram 03:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article may be a bit list-weighty; in other words, some of the lists should be converted to prose (paragraph form).
Done. Ideogram 23:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know the source of this image. How might we establish a fair use rationale? Ideogram 22:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is considered a seal or emblem, and there is a fair use rationale attached to the image. Ideogram 06:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have made a stab at this. See what you think. Ideogram 07:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. — Wackymacs 10:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]