Wikipedia:Peer review/Renaissance (band)/archive1

Renaissance (band) edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate the article to be upgraded to B class or higher, and I would greatly appreciate comments, and constructive criticism to enable me to understand where the article stands from a broader perspective. I have improved the article a significant amount, doing 132 edits, adding almost all of the inline citations to RS, and removing a seven year old refimprove tag. Comments covering all or any of the sections are keenly sought. I have had very little feedback from other editors, which I am hoping means that I have done some good. Many thanks, CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 08:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from DonEd edit

I've had a brief look at the article and it is nicely written. However:

  • The discography section makes the article WAY too long. They seem to have released a lot of music so maybe a separate page wouldn't be a bad idea.
  • You may want to go through each section and add more references to verify what you have written. There are many paragraphs with what has happened, but nothing to back it up. You can't accuse a man of murder without evidence after all! Horrible metaphor, I know.
  • In "Second incarnation (1971–80)" section, you start off with "Sometime in 1971..." When in 1971? It doesn't have to be the exact date, time and what they were wearing. Was it in the first quarter of the year? If known, was it in a particular month?
  • In the discography section, you are missing references for US chart peaks. I've checked the Billboard website and there doesn't seem to be any info on their chart peaks. However, there is the AllMusic website. Here's the link: [1] My internet is a bit slow at the moment so I can't check it.

That's all for the moment. I'll go through it again (unless someone else beats me to the punch) and see what else you need to do. But for the meantime, start fixing those references young man/lady!!! Otherwise give yourself a pat on the back and let me know if you have any questions! DonEd (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]