Wikipedia:Peer review/RCCX/archive1

RCCX edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like it to be assigned a proper class in content assessment WP:ASSESS

Thanks, Maxim Masiutin (talk) 23:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720 edit

@Maxim Masiutin: Wikipedia editors are not too concerned about rankings until GA. Are you interested in fixing up the article? If so, I would address the orange banner at the top of the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please peer-review the article? If you think I can fix it up somehow, please let me know what exactly should I improve. You also wrote "I would address the orange banner at the top of the article". Can you please specify what exactly do you mean by "address", i.e. which steps exactly should I take to "address" the banner? Do you mean that I should remove the banner? Maxim Masiutin (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another question is whether you can assign the "A" rating to the article, and, if not, what should I to in order it to be qualified for "A"? As far as I know, the "A" rating can be only obtained during a peer review. I got a couple of articles to the "GA" rating. I assigned the "A" rating to one of the nominated articles myself. Still, during one of such evaluation, the reviewer warned my that I should not have assigned the "A" rating myself because it was the reviewer's job.

Thank you very much for your attention and for your help! Maxim Masiutin (talk) 21:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxim Masiutin: Comments below:

The orange banner says "This article needs attention from an expert in genetics". I would suggest fixing up the article as best as possible, then posting on WP:SCIENCE to see if an expert can help ensure that the information is correct.
There should be a citation at the end of each paragraph.
An A rating usually occurs after a WP:GAN. I recommend that you do the GA review first. Also, many projects are not doing A-class reviews anymore, so after this achieves GA status you might want to consider an WP:FAC.
Additional sources can be found at Google Scholar, WP:LIBRARY, archive.org, or your local library system.

Hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 21:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]