Wikipedia:Peer review/Psilocybe tasmaniana/archive1

Psilocybe tasmaniana edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because it has been expanded fairly extensively from stub class. It is an old article that had no content and isn't likely to be found and reviewed by chance. It is the first article I've attempted to write and I would like any kind of constructive feedback and to hopefully move it out of stub class and in to something more accurate.

Thanks, Mycellenz (talk) 02:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Z1720 edit

Hi @Mycellenz:, here are some comments about the article:

Great job with the description. The second sentence in the "Published description" section is probably not needed.
The last paragraph in "Habitat and distribution" needs a citation.
Prose is not usually underlined, as seen in the last sentence in "Taxnomy"
Wikipedia has something called featured articles which is Wikipedia's best work; I often use these FAs as a template for my articles and ideas on what should be in an article. Some FAs on fungi include Cortinarius caperatus and Hydnum repandum.

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 21:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]