Wikipedia:Peer review/Pro-Test/archive1

I have submitted this article for Peer Review because practically all of the work has been done on this article by myself, and I wish to incorporate other perspectives on the organisation without inviting the vandalism that has led to the page being semi-protected. Thanks for the time of anyone who wishes to contribute. --ProTestOxford 20:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, I believe that your suggestions have been incorporated. Is there anything else that would improve the quality of the article? --ProTestOxford 11:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some images of the recent protest, or of the group's banners or literature, would be good. I agree with the <ref> suggestion - see Deus Caritas Est for a shorter example, and also how Saffron combines a section with notes separate from a section with references.
A short tutorial -
  1. Add the text of the references where they are needed in the article (so, for example, you should add a text desciption of your inline external links).
  2. Add "<ref>" before and "</ref>" after the text of each reference.
  3. Add "<references/>" towards the end.
Hopefully, all of the <ref>s should be replaced by little superscipt numbers, and the text of the reference should appear automatically at the end. If you need a reference more than one, give it a name, and cut and paste the same "<ref>...</ref>" more than once.
Good luck. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]