Wikipedia:Peer review/NoHomers.net/archive1

NoHomers.net edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I basically just need to know how to improve it, and I have hopes of it becoming a B-Class (or higher) article.

Thanks, Theleftorium (talk) 09:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.

The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself. My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way - please see WP:LEAD
Article needs more references, for example Episode reviewa section is unreferenced, My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed. {{cite web}} and other cite templates may be helpful. See WP:CITE and WP:V Also need many more refs from reliable (blogs are not generally reliable) independent thiurd party sources - if this were up for deletion, what would prove its notability? See WP:RSand WP:NN
Avoid needless repetition - the origin of the name is given twice, once as a long quote of dialog that probably abuses fair use.

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 11:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comments! I will go through them all soon. --TheLeft orium 13:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great username - I was tempted to add lots of "Diddlies" and other Flanders-isms to my review, but held back. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. If you like The Simpsons you can check out my Ned Flanders dedicated website, The Leftorium. ;) Anyway, I've made some changes to the article now. I haven't been able to reference all information but most of it is referenced now. TheLeft orium 15:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]