Wikipedia:Peer review/Morocco in World War II/archive1

Morocco in World War II edit

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like some templates, I have worries it is not set out properly or that my explanations may be too complex. I am also wondering what wikiproject it would belong to.

Thanks, 113ADP68 (talk) 23:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: G'day, 113ADP68, thank you for your efforts so far. I had a quick look and have a few suggestions. Unfortunately, I don't know much about the topic, so I can only give you general advice, I'm sorry: AustralianRupert (talk) 11:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • the lead probably needs expansion to adequately summarise the whole article - probably two or three paragraphs in this instance
  • in the lead, link "Axis", "Allies", "Vichy France" etc.
  • link Vichy France on first mention
  • in the References, avoid using all caps per MOS:ALLCAPS
  • where Churchill and Roosevelt -- add full names and wikilinks on first mention, and explain who these people were
  • In the lead up to the beginning of World War II --> "In the lead up to World War II"
  • Sultan Mohammad V: --> remove the colon here as it isn't necessary
  • same as above for Medical care on the Moroccan frontier:
  • are there any photographs that can be added? I would suggest adding one to the lead, and a couple more in the body of the article. Commons is likely to have some
  • I suggest maybe adding an Aftermath section to discuss the lasting impacts, if there were any (e.g on society, the economy, etc)
  • wikilink "Operation Torch" on first mention
  • General Schaeffer: full name and wikilink (if one exists) on first mention
  • many rapings and killings --> "many rapes and murders"?
  • in the mediterranean theatre --> capitalise "Mediterranean"
  • Mount Cassino --> "Monte Cassino"? Also, I suggest wikilinking the article on the battle here
  • add a wikilink for "Gustav line"...overall, I think there are probably quite a few terms or names that need wikilinking in the article, so I would suggest checking for these throughout (add a link first time the term or name is mentioned, if the subject is notable)
  • overall, I'd suggest you list the article for a copy edit over at WP:GOCE, so that you can get another set of eyes on it
  • anyway, that's it from me. Good luck with developing it further.