Wikipedia:Peer review/Metallica (album)/archive1

Metallica (album) edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Having been working on improving and expanding this very good article for days, I felt like it's gonna be listed as one of the arts good articles by this month, or the next month maybe, of this year 2011. So Metallica (album) has been listed for peer review because of that reason. My username is A\/\₉3r-(0la by the way. Any comments on improving the article further? A\/\₉3r-(0la 09:01, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, all references aren't bare links. A\/\₉3r-(0la 20:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica (album), an article about heavy metal music band Metallica's best-selling 1991 album, is 58KB long. It has 92 references, with some of them from Allmusic. I had a big fucking time mending it to that size, so User:Martarius fixed some of the problems contained in the article shortly after I got this article to PR. A\/\₉3r-(0la 20:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blaguymonkey also improved the article. Again, any comments on improving the article further? A\/\₉3r-(0la 21:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This peer review recieved no feedback within four (or possibly five) days. A\/\₉3r-(0la 21:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This peer review recieved no feedback within a week (seven days). A\/\₉3r-(0la 03:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Efe (talk · contribs) comments

Tour is part of promotion? --Efe (talk) 03:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you could merge that two subsections under critical response.
"[Bob] Rock's preeminent speed-metal cyclone," as opposed to "[Bob] Rock's preeminent speed-metal cyclone", Try Wikipedia:MOS#Punctuation_inside_or_outside.
Metallica debuted at number one at the Billboard 200,[38] the UK Albums Chart,[39] the ARIA Charts,[40] Switzerland,[41] the Netherlands,[42] Sweden,[43] Norway,[44] the Canadian Albums Chart,[45] Germany,[46] and New Zealand. You're mixing charts with countries (although you're referring to music charts of that particular country). --Efe (talk) 03:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you could organize the commercial performance section by country / region / continent.
Be careful of stray punctuation marks: [7][8]"
Album chart. Perhaps you provide position for each chart. WP:Record Charts.
Consistency: US Billboard 200 as opposed to Billboard 200.
Might also need a good copy edit.

That's all for now. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 03:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All concerns fixed. Ready for WP:GAN. A\/\₉3r-(0la 21:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]