MIT edit

Please address length of article (~70kb), academic boosterism or other issues of tone/perspective, topics overlooked. The article has previously been a FAC and is now a "Good Article" but substantial revisions have been made in recent months which have remained stable. Previously on RFF. Madcoverboy 17:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 23:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Obvious\egregious suggestions\problems have largely been addressed.Madcoverboy 06:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have inserted a couple of comments identifying bad prose. More later. --Ideogram 14:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • My hack at smoothing it out is in.Madcoverboy 11:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]