Wikipedia:Peer review/Marshall Plan/archive1

Marshall Plan edit

A major topic that I first worked on back in 2004. I have recently expanded and referenced it and would like to get it up to featured article quality. It almost certainly still needs some copyediting, and there may also be errors or omissions that need to be corrected. - SimonP 17:35, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

It looks good to me. I only saw one word that needed a copyedit. The page is pretty thorough and appears to cover the topic in a neutral and balanced manner. About the only thing I see missing is a coverage of the phrase "we need a Marshall plan for..." as a motivation for spending a bunch of money on some big U.S. foreign aid package. (A search on "a Marshall plan for" in google turns up 15,500 hits. :) — RJH 15:02, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that looks great. I don't know enough about the subject to know if there is anything innacurate or missing except for the above, but it appears well researched. Great work. Unless you know of things you should fix, but haven't, this looks like a clear FAC to me. Might as well do it right away if you have the time to answer the FAC comments or objections if there are any. - Taxman Talk 23:19, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
Looks good. May need some ilinks (I just went over lead), and a few more links to people/events in specific countries (I will take care of Poland), but nonetheless it is something I believe would pass FAC. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]