MNIST database edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm trying to make it a Good Article and would like some feedback first. Specifically, I would like suggestions on what content should be added to the article and how the writing in the article can be cleaned up.
Thanks, APerson (talk!) 20:54, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Reads OK, I was reading with interest and then it ended after two sections! So the first thing it needs is more. Possibilities:
- Some of the more notable scientific results from it
- Some production technologies that have come out of it
- Caltech 101 and LabelMe in the "See also" looked of non-obvious relevance at first glance, but looking at them obviously they're highly relevant. Perhaps a section mentioning other such image databases with relevance to MNIST? Not sure how to make that really clearly on-topic ...
- I see you've done a pretty good scouring of the available sources.
- I did the obvious Google search for sources, or other general articles on it, and do you know, this is about the best writeup of what it actually is that exists. So it's a useful thing. Well done :-) - David Gerard (talk) 17:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)