Wikipedia:Peer review/List of FA Amateur Cup winners/archive1
List of FA Amateur Cup winners edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for January 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
Following on from List of FA Trophy winners and List of FA Vase winners, I now give you the third in the triumvirate of English national non-league football cups. Please let me know if anything needs changing before I send this one to FLC too....
Thanks, ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: The list itself is fine, in accordance with the established successful format. I have a few questions on the prose.
- Lead, second paragraph: This doesn't read very well as it stands, I'm not sure why. I tried putting the final sentence at the front of the paragraph, and I thought it sounded better. Try it out, see what you think.
- History. Section looks a bit thin; I wonder if it could be fleshed out a bit? For example, I see from the link to the FA Amateur Cup article that in the post-WWII years, attendances at the final reached 100,000. This seems extraordinary for a football match between basically small-time teams. I doubt that this size of crowd was maintained; could we have something about fluctuating levels of interest in this competition? Again, this is just a suggestion.
- Finals: If the cup wasn't staged during the First World War, when was the 1915-15 tournament (won by Clapton) played?
Not much else to say, really. Neat work Brianboulton (talk) 22:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your comments. I'll add a little to the history section, although as this is the List of Winners article as opposed to the main article on the Cup itself, I don't want to stray too far from talking specifically about the winners of the tournament..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)