Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Anuran families/archive1

List of Anuran families edit

I created this a while ago as it took up far too much room in Frog. Now I have expanded it to include a table structure, which allows for example photos, and the species of that photo. I am now stuck as to how to improve it. I know that it needs to fill up the photos, but that will be a slow process as people gradually add frogs within a family. Other than that, can anyone think of extra columns to place into the list, or anything that is currently wrong with the list? My end objective is to create a featured list. Thanks --liquidGhoul 11:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd clear the table so it's not limited in widthby the taxobox (eitehr that or drop the taxobox entirely, it's not really necessary)
  • This article is linked for more details about the taxonomy of Anura, so I'd suggest adding prose describing rapidly what differenciates the different divisions.
  • ITIS (or whichever system is most pertinent) or wikispecies links would be appropriate.
  • Ideally, I assume you plan to fill in empty cells?
  • Circeus 02:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think I have covered these things. Yes, I am planning to fill the empty cells, but as I said, it is not easy and will probably take a lot of time. On point 1, the table is only impeded by the taxobox in 800x600 resolution, and if I clear it, it looks really bad in higher resolutions (which I assume are the majority). Therefore I would rather leave it as it is, as it is only a corner chopped off by the taxobox in 800x600. Thanks--liquidGhoul 06:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the table is rather impeded at 1020x800 (which is my resolution) It looks just inappropriate to have it stop that short from the side. (it's not a corner chopped off, the table stops 200px from the side!) Circeus 13:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really know what you mean. The table never fills up the browser window completely, do you want it to do that? --liquidGhoul 21:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]