Wikipedia:Peer review/Kesha discography/archive1

Kesha discography edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i plan to nominate it for FL status in the next couple weeks. I would appreciate feedback regarding any mistakes so i dont get shot down in 5 seconds durning the nomination.

Thanks, (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 03:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brianboulton comments: I have reviewed a few of these discographies, and this one looks generally up to the mark, but needs polishing around the edges.

  • Prose issues
    • "Her musical genres incorporates..." Either "genres incorporate" or "genre incorporates"   Done
    • "Although an active musician since 2005..." Requires a verb, thus: "Although she has been an active musician since 2005..." etc   Done
    • "...after appearing on Flo Rida's number one single..." The "ing" form is not grammatical here. It needs to be "after she appeared on..."   Done
    • Can you explain what is meant by "regions" in this context: "The song reached number one in twelve regions and has been certified gold or platinum in nine countries."?
    • MOS requires that numerics of a value less than 10 should be written out, thus "five million" not "5 million".   Done
    • "album's", not "albums"
Sorry where is this located? - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me -   Done
  • Tables: very little to pick on here:-
    • Why are sales figures given only for the album, not the singles?
Because there done in certs more then specific numbers, albums tell you weekly sales, singles dont. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me -
Because in the MOS guidelines for discographies, only albums have sales figures. Fixer23 (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • The note: "Kesha is not credited in North America" raises the question as to why this was so.
    • The further note under "Other appearances": "Kesha is not credited" raises the same issue
Its just the way they were released. Not all artists get credit when there not famous. Dont know why... - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me -
Do you mean that there should be further explanations to supplement those notes? Fixer23 (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Is "appearances" the right word, unless these are video recordings?
Would collaborations make more sense? Fixer23 (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Format issue: In only one of the six tables do you use a "refs" column. Is there any reason why this wasn't done in the earlier tables?
I dont know what you mean. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me -
It would only make sense in that table (and probably the music videos table), the other tables have their refs under the charting countries. Fixer23 (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is about all I can find. Brianboulton (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]