| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I feel that after much renovation and work on the article, it may be up to FL status. I'd welcome any tips for the page's improvement before I go ahead and nominate the article for FL-listing.
Thanks, Holiday56 (talk) 10:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Comments from Sufur222
Very small points:
- The caption under the infobox image shouldn't have a full stop.
- "It spawned two Grammy Award-winning singles" --> Might want a reference for that.
- "West's fourth album went in a controversially new direction, with him singing rather than rapping." --> Ditto.
- The Collaborative albums table doesn't need a legend at the bottom, as all of the cells are currently filled.
- See here for formatting ref 179.
- Refs 173, 191 and 194 need en-dashes, as do all of the The Official Charts Company refs.
- What makes refs 9, 159, 165 and 217 reliable? I've never heard of them.
Apart from that, this looks great. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 13:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking at the article. I've taken a look at your points, and I've made the necessary changes.
- "The caption under the infobox image shouldn't have a full stop."
- "It spawned two Grammy Award-winning singles" – I've changed this sentence to make it instead talk about the total number of singles released from the album.
- "West's fourth album went in a controversially new direction, with him singing rather than rapping." – I've removed this sentence. This information is probably better explained in the 808s & Heartbreak article itself.
- "The Collaborative albums table doesn't need a legend at the bottom, as all of the cells are currently filled." Removed.
- Reference 179 has been properly formatted.
- En dashes added for the references mentioned.
- References 9, 159, 165 and 217 have been changed to more reliable sources.
- "The caption under the infobox image shouldn't have a full stop."
- Are there any more changes to be made? I think I've taken care of the points you've brought up. Holiday56 (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Only a couple of other things I've noticed on a further read through: careful of overusing the word "spawned" in the lead, and ref 156 needs an en-dash. Apart from that, this looks ready to take to FLC. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 08:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, then. I've made the necessary changes. Holiday56 (talk) 10:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Only a couple of other things I've noticed on a further read through: careful of overusing the word "spawned" in the lead, and ref 156 needs an en-dash. Apart from that, this looks ready to take to FLC. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 08:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)