Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch articleWatch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because…

The article has changed dramatically in the last two weeks. Are there any ways in which it can be improved? Are there any gaps in the information provided? I realize that the section "Economic impact" may be too short compared to the other sections. Do you recommend an expansion?

Thanks,

Dem393 (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]