Wikipedia:Peer review/Hwacha/archive1

Hwacha

This article has been developed by many editors. I am requesting if there should be anything wrong in this article and if it qualifies as a FA article. thanks Good friend100 18:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References come after puncuation, [5]. should be .[5]
Move, merge, expand the one sentence paragraphs, this will make people object per criteria 1a. of FA criteria, "well-written"
The See Also section comes before the references sections
Remove the redlinked article under "See Also" - the point of the section is to link to articles that exist.
Expand the lead to two paragraphs, per WP:LEAD. You can split the info from the first paragraph add a bit etc
Have an in-line reference for each paragraph
Don't wikilink solo years, example - 1934
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 100 meters, use 100 meters, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 100 meters.^[?]
Avoid misplaced formality: “in order to/for” (-> to/for), “thereupon”, “notwithstanding”, etc.
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.^[?]
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km², and pounds -> lb.^[?] M3tal H3ad 03:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]