Wikipedia:Peer review/Hoysala Empire/archive1

Hoysala Empire edit

Please review this article for balance, grammar, format etc. Per Taxman's advice, I have tried to bring a balance to the article by adding information on Religion, Society, Agriculture, Administration etc. If there is anything else that needs to be done, I would glad to comply. Please provide feedback on this discussion page.Dineshkannambadi 15:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 19:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken care of Redundant, vague and weasel words. I am currently looking into the Lead section, spellings and copy edits.Dineshkannambadi 20:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments The section "Religion" is unnecessarily big. There is no need to describe short biographies of the three people. What is important is their/their movements' impact on the empire or afterwards. It's better to just mention their names and schools (with proper wikilinks), and then go straight to impact. This will also reduce the size of the article(which is already intimidating).

Also, please try to restrict wikilinking the same term several times in the article. CE was wikilinked multiple times, often in almost in succession. Shall try to read the whole article later. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply-->Ok I will take care of the Religion section .ThanksDineshkannambadi 18:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment compressed "Religion" and added citation in "imports and Exports" section.Dineshkannambadi 23:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go for FAC It's been great work. IMO, you'll have to wait long for getting more reviews in the PR. Have a final look and go for FAC ASAP. The article will get more reviews there in the FAC. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply-->Ok. Thanks.Dineshkannambadi 21:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]