Faidherbe Bridge edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i would like to know if i could propose it for FA.
Thanks, Mario1987 13:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
My comments on the article:
- Lead section is only one sentence. The lead should be 1-2 paragraphs for an article this size and summarize the whole article.
- Some paragraphs have no references.
- "With all it's difficulties" should be its not it's.
- Some of the images seem to have licensing problems. The stamp image has a licensing statement saying it can only be used on an article illustring the stamp. What is the date of the postcards? It says 100+ years beyond the author's death, but you don't give a publication date for either card
- The picture legends on the postards should be relevant to the article. Discuss the picture and not the fact it is a postcard
- The references are not properly formatted and don't have access dates for the urls.
- Overall the writing needs improvement. It is certainly understandble, but is not well written enough to be FA status as written. Biomedeng (talk) 03:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)