Enya edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 03:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is a good article for the FA. It has all the references.
Thanks, Ineversigninsodonotmessageme (talk) 02:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Ineversigninsodonotmessageme
Here are my suggetions to improving the article:
- References are not properly formatted per the MOS. Also all websites need an accessed date listed by them in the references.
- At least one place has a space between the sentence period and the reference
- Several places do not have sufficient inline reference (example: the part about what her parents did has no citation) and there are complete paragraphs without citations
- The article has several citation needed tags that need references
- The comment that Enya is a very private person seems rather subjective and not verifiable.
I don't think this is ready for FA status because a lot of statements need referencing. Biomedeng (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)