| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to know if there is any other information that should be added.
Thanks, Koda8416 (talk) 07:43, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Per WP:WikiProject Palaeontology guidelines, this article should be merged back into the Enhydriodon genus article, which is extremely short anyway. Articles about prehistoric species should be kept at genus level, unless they are too long, which is certainly not the case here. Especially considering that most of what is written in the species article applies to the genus as a whole. FunkMonk (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)