Wikipedia:Peer review/Darth Vader/archive2

Very good article just needs some fine tuning...somehow. Thefourdotelipsis 06:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fair use images require fair use rationales. Per WP:LEAD, it would be best to keep the lead at a maximum of 3 paragraphs. AndyZ 19:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is also evidence of weasel words- “He is often considered one of the iconic villains of popular culture”. By whom is he considered such? AndyZ 19:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's an observation based on a very reasonable and generally accepted opinion. You don't need a quote or a source for a statement like this. / Peter ^Isotalo 17:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article describes Vader too much though he was a real person. The amount of personal information should be reduced. The level of detail right now is very crufty / Peter ^Isotalo 17:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The focus is all wrong. The article treats Vader as if he is a real person when he is, in fact, not. Please see User:Uncle G/Describe this universe and User:BrianSmithson/Writing about fiction for ideas on how to rewrite this article. — BrianSmithson 20:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]