Wikipedia:Peer review/D.Va/archive1

D.Va edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I think it could eventually (sooner than later) be a potential FA candidate. After a peer review, I'll ask for a copyedit as well.

It'd be cool to see what an editor who doesn't really edit video game articles thinks about this one (I think it'd offer a valuable perspective, sort of a "fresh pair of eyes" type of thing), but I'd be happy and appreciative with any peer commentary.

Much thanks :-) Soulbust (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'll probably work on this once my GA and FA assessments are done. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. And, since you are still seeking your first successful FAC, I suggest seeking a FA mentor and start reviewing FACs now to build goodwill among the FAC regulars. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Soulbust: This has been open for over a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving reviews? If so, I suggest asking for a review at the Wikiprojects attached to this article. Z1720 (talk) 19:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess for now, not really. I have some ideas to further work on the article and they're somewhat substantial. Not a complete overhaul but I'll be moving some things around in the article, so I think any peer review would be best for after that. Just gotta be able to sit down sometime soon and work on the article. Soulbust (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]