| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is devoid of any citations and seems to be full of bias.
Thanks, Mabibliophile (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: These are not good reasons for requesting a peer review. If you have issues with the article, you should try and resolve these on the talkpage with the editors concerned. I appreciate that this is difficult when the main contributors are anonymous IPs, but you should at least state your case there, giving examples of the bias you allege. Conflict resolution is not the purpose of peer review, and articles with cleanup banners are not normally considered ready for review. Brianboulton (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)