I think it is Good Article quality, but I want to know what my peers think before nominating it. I know it could use more info around the standard gun's section. Does anyone else see anything else wrong with the article? GangstaEB (sliding logs~dive logs) 13:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- by Jon513
- The word new in the first sentences doesn't make any sense in an encyclopedia. Imagine if you were reading and old Britannica and it says a cotton gin is a new invention! Remove it or consider replacing it with "invented in whatever year".
- All of the pictures on the page are copyrighted and a fair use rational for all of them is questionable considering that the page it a bit crowded with pictures. I recommend removing all the picture except for one and put it in an {{Infobox Weapon}} (see Uzi submachine gun)
- This article fits into more categories, start by looking at other guns and see what categories they are in.
- The references should be change to a {{cite web}} or {{cite news}} as appropriate.
- In general more reliable sources are need (a joke forum!)
- While there is no need to repeat everything said in Urban warfare there should be some discussion on the need to create such a weapon.
- The preceding review was by Jon513 on 16:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- There is too many forms to just put in infobox weapon. GangstaEB (sliding logs~dive logs) 16:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- There are also variants of the Uzi. Jon513 05:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 14:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)