- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it would need to be a part of a planned featured topic on Dwarf planets. So I would need to bring this article to GA-class. What is it missing?
Thanks, Nergaal (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Review by Ruslik:
- 1) The table is too overwhelming. I think the images of planets/dwarf planets should be removed from it—this will make the table more compact.
- 2) The lead does not summarize the article, it contains information that is mentioned nowhere in the main text. I suggest moving it into the main part of the article and writing a new lead, which, in addition, should be shorter.
- 3) Some paragraphs are uncited. As I remember, Jewitt and Brown wrote something about classification of the planets. Their works should be cited as well.