Beckton Gas Works edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… the article has gone through substantial development by a relatively new editor, and he needs to be given some indication of how his work fits into the wikipedia quality process.
Thanks, Kbthompson (talk) 00:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The principal editor would benefit from feedback on:
- Manual of style issues
- Comprehensiveness and relevance - what do people want to see from an article of this type
- A plan to move the article forward to Good Article status
Thanks Kbthompson (talk) 09:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments from MeegsC: A few notes to start, with more to come...
- The lead is far too short. It should summarize the basic points of the article.
- Eliminate as many 1-2 sentence paragraphs as possible. Can they be expanded, or combined with other paragraph?
- Popular culture sections are generally discouraged, but at a minimum, you should convert the list of bullet points into proper paragraphs. And all the items in this section would need in-line referencing.
- The assertion that the "Beckton Alps" is the highest artificial hill in London needs a reference.
MeegsC | Talk 11:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, very useful comments. I'll drawer the editor's attention to the review. cheers Kbthompson (talk) 11:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)