Wikipedia:Peer review/Bayonetta/archive2


Previous peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because let's face it, I hate seeing one of my all time favourite games just languishing in B-Class (I want to get this to at least GA). Any suggestions for improvement are welcome.

Thanks, MiasmaEternalTALK 01:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, peer reviews seem more common for FAs or when we need a major rearrangement. Stuff that might be fixing is:

  • Reference every paragraph in gameplay
  • Wouldn't Bloody Fate be featured alongside the sequel?
  • The awards could be separated from the press reception to avoid confusion. See Judgment (video game) or Devil May Cry 5.
  • The press reception might be benefited by focusing on generalizations to reduce overdetails and have "the gameplay was praised due to its" rather than saying "X praised this". It seems to be a common new idea. See Judgment and DMC5 or (DMC4) that also use this arrangement.
  • If you are worried about the prose you could also ask for a copyedit.

Hope this helps.