Batman: Arkham Origins edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to FA alongside Arkham Asylum and Arkham City, but as it wasn't received as well as those two games the coverage is less and I feel like it is missing something. A fresh set of eyes would beneficial in making sure it is as complete as possible so it can be nominated.
Thanks, Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments by URDNEXT edit
I'll take a look at the article. By the way, Darkwarriorblake, is there any way you could give some feedback to the Sleeping Dogs (video game) peer review too? That would be much appreciated. Thanks!
- Lead feels too short for FA. Specially the 2nd paragraph.
- A paragraph for gameplay would be nice.
- The opening of the 2nd paragraph kinda bugs me for some reason. I think it needs rephrasing.
More comments inbound. URDNEXT (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Completely agree about the lead. Dunno if it was this way when I was reviewing for GA, but if so, that was an unfortunate oversight on my part. Considering the size of the page, four full paragraphs would not at all be unreasonable. Tezero (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)