I've listed this article for peer review because as one of the focal articles of the Guns N' Roses Wikiproject, it'd really be nice to see it achieve GA or FA status...or at least, something higher than the Start classification it currently has. It's sourced, footnoted and has been through a lot of style and grammar checks since it was assessed at the Start level, but I'm not sure where it needs to go on the road to FA or how to take it there. Any feedback at all about improving the article, making it more interesting, et al would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
DanielEng (talk) 07:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input! I did look over the review, and have made some minor edits to the article. Unfortunately a lot of what is said there is not applicable to the article (for instance, all the conjunctions are in quotes and the proper names of songs and articles), but I've tried to use whatever I can. Any additional feedback would be appreciated! Thanks, DanielEng (talk) 11:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)