orpahned image, the GFDL license was added by another user on the basis that the uploader "use to upload photos like these". Given the lack of any specific encyclopedic use for this particular image I would suggest deletion rather then assumption. User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orpahned image, listed as sourced from PL Wikipedia, but a note was added that PL Wiki did not have any source info. The PL image is now deleted. I think it is better to err on the side of deletion. User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned image, questionable PD license. unable to locate at the source where the university thinks it is public domain. User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orpahned image, absent uploader, I question the license and no source information provided to substantiate the PD claim User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned image, unencyclopedic given large black arrow in image, also, I question the license as PD-self or if it is a scan with no source provided User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 02:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned images with questionable copyright status - no evidence of copyright having been assigned/renounced. Ohconfucius 03:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic - This is supposedly an image of the letter written by Grace Bedell to Abraham Lincoln suggesting that he grow a beard. It is obviously fake. It is bloody, perhaps implying that it was found on Lincoln's clothes when he was assassinated, but the blood is bright red, which it should not be if the letter is 150 years old. The text is photoshopped on top of the wrinkled paper and is obviously not affected by the wrinkles and contours of the paper underneath. — TomTheHand 14:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphanded, not ensyclopeidc, presumably a leftover from one of those "divisive userboxes" or some such...- Sherool(talk) 15:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: modified to express POV, and the license probably isn't correct either anymore. +mwtoews 05:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well the license bit is my doing, just copied the original since adding two diagonal lines probably fail the treshold of creativity. It used to be labeled as a {{wikipedia-screenshot}}... --Sherool(talk) 07:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Link is now pointing to Commons, nominated for deletion there. --kingboyk 20:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orpahned image, I question if the image is acutally GFDL licensed. There is some discussion on the image talk page, but here is a quote from the copyright notice page of the source under commercial use "You do not need to pay for usage, either, though I reserve the right to deny usage on sites that I find to be truly poisonous". User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 20:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that's probably not GFDL. I remember e-mailing him and he said we could but that probably doesn't cut it. Adam Bishop 21:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned image, absent uploader, image tagged as PD, it is a logo but unsure if it is a real one or not User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=delete){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=history){kind=link}
